Resources

spacer
spacer spacer
Home > Resources & Downloads > Feedback
Visit Feedback

Who is filling out this form?
District:
  Review Year:
Supt/with Administrative team — as district’s official reply
Username:    Password:
Participant in an EQA visit
Educator
Member of community
Other:

The preparation before the visit:
1)
The information that the district received was timely.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
2)
Preparing the requested documents for advance submission to EQA and review onsite was not too time consuming.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
3)
Communication [letter, phone, email] with the EQA coordinator was responsive and helpful.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
4)
We visited the EQA web site and found the information there to be extremely useful in preparing for the visit.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
5)
We were able to get all our questions answered in advance of the visit and knew what to expect.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
 Suggestions for improving the pre-onsite elements of our process:

The visit:
6)
Four days for the onsite was the right amount of time given the scope of the EQA review.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
7)
The onsite visit was a positive experience for the school and community.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
8)
The interview schedule used the time of participants well.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
9)
The content focus of interviews was appropriate and related to the EQA standards and indicators.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
10)
The interviews were conducted professionally.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
11)
At the conclusion of the onsite, we knew what to expect next from EQA and when it would happen.
Strongly Agree   Agree   Disagree   Strongly Disagree   N/A 
 Suggestions for improving the onsite review process: