Overview
EQA...
Introduction
Process
Mission
Relationship to DOE
EQA Team
Contact
EMAC...
Introduction
Legislative Mandate
Board Members
Contact
Meeting Agendas/Minutes
Events
Press Releases
In the News
Research Papers
Budget
Introduction
Standards (PDF)
Calendar
District Resources
Process Overview
Document Checklist (PDF)
Attachments
Orientation Slide Show
FAQ
Feedback
Contact EQA
District Central
Introduction
Districts Reviewed
Technical Reports
General Reports
Annual Reports
Research Papers
Glossary of Terms
Contact Information
EMAC Board
Feedback
Employment Opportunities
Useful Links
Massachusetts Department of Education
No Child Left Behind
Home
Introduction
Standards (PDF)
Calendar
District Resources:
Process Overview
Document Checklist (PDF)
Attachments
Orientation Slide Show
FAQ
Feedback
Contact EQA
District Central
How does an EQA review differ
from other audits?
How's the website?
Comments/suggestions
Home
>
Resources & Downloads
>
Feedback
Visit Feedback
Who is filling out this form?
District:
-- Select District --
Abby Kelley Foster Charter Public School
Abington
Acd. Of the Pacific Rim Charter
Acushnet
Adams Cheshire
Agawam
Amesbury
Amherst Regional
Arlington
Ashburnham-Westminster
Assabet Valley
Athol-Royalston
Attleboro
Auburn
Avon
Ayer
Barnstable
Belchertown
Bellingham
Belmont
Berkley
Berkshire Hills
Beverly
Billerica
Blackstone Valley
Blue Hills
Boston
Boston - Greenwood (UPFUR)
Boston - Perkins (UPFUR)
Boston Collegiate Charter
Boston Day and Evening Academy
Bourne
Braintree
Bridgewater-Raynham
Bristol-Plymouth
Brockton
Burlington
Cambridge
Canton
Chelsea
Chicopee
Clarksburg
Clinton
Concord-Carlisle
Danvers
Dartmouth
Dennis-Yarmouth
Dighton-Rehoboth
Douglas
Douglas - Finance Audit
Dracut
East Bridgewater
East Longmeadow
Easthampton
Easton
Edward Brooke Charter
Erving Union 28
Essex Agr. Tech
Everett
Excel Academy Charter
Fairhaven
Fall River
Falmouth
Fitchburg
Four Rivers Charter
Foxborough
Foxborough Regional Charter School
Framingham
Franklin
Franklin County
Freetown-Lakeville
Gardner
Gateway Regional
Gill-Montague
Gloucester
Grafton
Greater Fall River
Greater Lawrence
Greater Lowell Voc Tec
Greater New Bedford
Greenfield
Groton-Dunstable
Hampshire
Harvard
Harwich
Haverhill
Health Careers Academy
Holbrook
Holyoke
Hudson
Hull
Lawrence
Lee
Leicester
Leominster
Littleton
Longmeadow
Lowell
Lowell - Sullivan School (UPFUR)
Lunenburg
Lynn
Malden
Marlborough
Marshfield
Mashpee
Maynard
McAuliffe Regional Charter
Medfield
Medford
Melrose
Mendon-Upton
Methuen
Middleboro
Milford
Minuteman
Mohawk Trail
Monson
Montachusett RVT
Mystic Valley Regional Charter (District)
Nahant
Nantucket
Narragansett
Nashoba
Nashoba Valley Tech
Nauset
Needham
New Bedford
New Leadership Charter
Newburyport
North Adams
North Andover
North Attleborough
North Brookfield
North Central Essential Charter
North Middlesex
Northampton
Northampton-Smith RVT
Northborough, Southborough
Northbridge
Northeast Metropolitan RVT
Northern Berkshire
Norton
Norwood
Old Colony
Old Rochester
Orange
Oxford
Palmer
Pathfinder
Peabody
Pentucket
Pioneer Valley
Pittsfield
Plainville
Plymouth
Quabbin
Quaboag
Quincy
Ralph C. Mahar
Randolph
Revere
Rising Tide Charter
Rockland
Salem
Sandwich
Saugus
Seekonk
Sharon
Shawsheen
Shirley
Silver Lake
Smith Leadership Academy
Somerville
South Hadley
South Middlesex RVT
Southbridge
Southeastern
Southern Berkshire
Southern Worcester City VT
Spencer-E.Brookfield
Springfield
Springfield UPFURS (Homer Street)
Springfield UPFURS (Kiley Middle)
Springfield UPFURS (Washington Elementary)
Springfield UPFURS (White Street)
Stoneham
Stoughton
Sturgis Charter Public School
Swampscott
Tantasqua
Taunton
Test
Tewksbury
Tri County RVT
Triton
Uphams Corner Charter
Upper Cape
Uxbridge
Wachusett
Waltham
Ware
Wareham
Webster
Wellesley
West Boylston
West Springfield
Westfield
Westford
Westport
Weymouth
Whitman-Hansen
Whittier Voc
Winchendon
Winthrop
Woburn
Worcester
Review Year:
-- Select Year --
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Supt/with Administrative team — as district’s official reply
Username:
Password:
Participant in an EQA visit
Educator
Member of community
Other:
The preparation before the visit:
1)
The information that the district received was timely.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
2)
Preparing the requested documents for advance submission to EQA and review onsite was not too time consuming.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
3)
Communication [letter, phone, email] with the EQA coordinator was responsive and helpful.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
4)
We visited the EQA web site and found the information there to be extremely useful in preparing for the visit.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
5)
We were able to get all our questions answered in advance of the visit and knew what to expect.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Suggestions for improving the pre-onsite elements of our process:
The visit:
6)
Four days for the onsite was the right amount of time given the scope of the EQA review.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
7)
The onsite visit was a positive experience for the school and community.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
8)
The interview schedule used the time of participants well.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
9)
The content focus of interviews was appropriate and related to the EQA standards and indicators.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
10)
The interviews were conducted professionally.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
11)
At the conclusion of the onsite, we knew what to expect next from EQA and when it would happen.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Suggestions for improving the onsite review process:
Home
|
About EQA
|
News & Events
|
Resources & Downloads
|
Reports
|
Contact Us
|
Links